14th June 2024
The Nationwide Firm Regulation Tribunal (NCLT) on Wednesday requested former BharatPe managing director Ashneer Grover to ascertain the maintainability of his petition filed with the tribunal looking for aid from actions taken by Gurugram-based fintech firm in opposition to him, and his spouse and former head of controls at BharatPe Madhuri Jain.

On Wednesday, the tribunal heard arguments on the quantum of stake Ashneer Grover, who can be the founding father of BharatPe, holds within the firm. His lawyer Giriraj Subramanium argued that compulsorily convertible choice shares (CCPS) issued to different buyers of BharatPe didn’t have equivalence with fairness shares, for which the tribunal requested the counsel to submit precedents.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with Excessive-Worth Ability Programs

Providing Faculty Course Web site
IIM Kozhikode IIMK Senior Administration Programme Go to
Indian College of Enterprise ISB Digital Transformation Go to
Northwestern College Kellogg Put up Graduate Certificates in Product Administration Go to

The case might be heard subsequent on January 11.
Ashneer Grover filed the case with the NCLT’s New Delhi bench in January this 12 months, pleading earlier than the tribunal to declare the actions of BharatPe’s administration led by chairman Rajnish Kumar as being in opposition to the pursuits of the corporate.

Additionally learn | BharatPe vs Ashneer Grover saga: The story to date…

He additionally sought the revocation of Madhuri Jain’s termination from the corporate.

Uncover the tales of your curiosity


Grover’s counsel Subramanium argued that he may search aid underneath the Part 241 and 242 of the Corporations Act 2013, contemplating he holds greater than 40% of fairness shares of the corporate, whereas stressing that buyers of BharatPe, who have been issued CCPS, had not transformed them into fairness shares.To this, the tribunal requested the petitioner to ascertain this by producing present judgments that present whether or not choice shares shouldn’t be handled as fairness shares whereas accounting for shareholding of an organization. Failing this, the tribunal will dismiss the petition.

BharatPe and its board was represented by senior counsels Krishnendu Dutta, Abhijit Sinha together with Anuj Berry.

BharatPe, in February 2022, sacked Jain, alleging misappropriation of funds. It later filed a case with Delhi Police’s Financial Offences Wing (EOW), looking for motion in opposition to the duo. In a standing report back to the Delhi Excessive Courtroom, final month, the EOW mentioned it has discovered bill discrepancies in BharatPe’s books, with no less than eight human useful resource (HR) consultancy corporations having linkages to Jain and her members of the family.

Grover has additionally appeared in entrance of the EOW for questioning within the alleged fraud case.

Keep on prime of expertise and startup information that issues. Subscribe to our each day e-newsletter for the newest and must-read tech information, delivered straight to your inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.